Wednesday, 25 August 2010

A short history of celebrity today

Watch A short history of celebrity today
It's all about tearing them down. And they eat it up!
By Jessa Crispin

Would you rather be rich or famous?” It’s one of those meaningless questions you ask when you’re trying to crack open the person you’re all smitten and warm and stupid over, when you’re trying to figure out their capacity. And maybe he has the capability to be both, but you want a value system. You want to know who he is and who he will be in 10 years because you maybe want to saddle up next to him.

A Short History of Celebrity by Fred Inglis. 322 pages. Princeton University Press. $29.95.
“Famous.” That was an answer I had to deal with. He thinks Cary Grant when he thinks famous. I think of Jensen Ackles, a heartthrobbish TV actor from Supernatural who is being stalked by a seriously unhinged 19-year-old girl. She has gone online and posted fake interviews by Ackles in which he claims the two are married and deeply in love. I think of the bizarre, sinister, and letterless package I received recently. It made me feel as if I were being watched through a pair of binoculars. I figure fame would be like that feeling I got opening the package, only happening every second of the day.

I also think of Jessica Slaughter, another unhinged teenage girl who tells YouTube audiences to “suck my non-existing dick and die.” She became the object of a harassment campaign by one website, which caused a second website to come to her defense, only to have the second website’s commenters declare the young girl needed to be put in her place.

Celebrity is a weird gig. It used to be the place of well scrubbed, heavily managed stars. Now the barriers are down, anyone can be famous for a little while if they are OK with being outrageously idiotic, and people confuse notoriety with fame, or at the very least, are happy with either. This is quite a change from the moment celebrity was born, at least according to Fred Inglis in his new book A Short History of Celebrity, with the construction of Elizabeth I as the Virgin Queen, the untouchable monarch who was as much a metaphor as a human. Celebrity used to be performance. Now if you’re found out to be performing, if any insincerity is sensed, the knives come out.

There’s a difference between renown, fame, and celebrity. Renown requires you to do something, and do it well, and we don’t really have much place for that anymore. Who won the Nobel Prize for Economics three years ago? Exactly. Fame has more to do with wealth and power, a long-term strategy. Madonna is famous, an icon flexible enough to hold the public’s eye through decades of transformation. Celebrity, though, is cheap. Inglis declares celebrity is “either won or conferred by the mere fact of a person’s being popularly acknowledged, familiarly recognised, attended to, selected as a topic for gossip, speculation, emulation, envy, groundless affection, or dislike.” If you can judge an era by its celebrities, then you can say ours is a spiteful, bitter, cynical age in which intelligence and fortitude are poorly valued, but filling a house with an inappropriate number of children is celebrated.

We no longer even allow our celebrities to present a flattering thigh angle. Now we want cellulite, we want frailty and despair, we want her husband to leave her for a crazy Nazi porn star so that we can feign sympathy while we pour over the lurid details. We don’t even bother to smooth out contradictions — we will rail against the dangers and sickness of modern paparazzi while simultaneously, sometimes in the same sentence, reference a picture of Julia Roberts leaving a Starbucks without any makeup.

Yet it’s still a game everyone wants in on. People are desperate to be torn to shreds by the masses. If they don’t have it in themselves, they’ll turn the spotlight on their own children. Take the freak show that is TLC’s reality show about the child beauty pageant world, Toddlers and Tiaras. I would love for a former beauty pageant pawn to stand up, turn around to her overbearing stage mom, and recite the speech in Dickens’s Dombey and Son, given by a woman paraded around in the hopes of changing their family’s fortunes:

coppied by http://www.thesmartset.com/article/article08041001.aspx

Saturday, 21 August 2010

Enjoy AntiMatterRadio-Connection Between Illuminati & Plato-Today's World Ruled By Philospoher Kings

Watches this new video AntiMatterRadio-Connection Between Illuminati & Plato-Today's World Ruled By Philospoher Kings


Coppied by http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiiYT7r551c&feature=search

we watches this Michael Jackson

Enjoy Michael Jackson in 1984, several months before he completed the writing of "We Are the World"

Before the writing of "We Are the World", American entertainer and social activist Harry Belafonte had sought for some time to have a song recorded by the most famous artists in the music industry at the time. He planned to have the proceeds donated to a new organization called United Support of Artists for Africa (USA for Africa). The non-profit foundation would then feed and relieve starving people in Africa, specifically Ethiopia, where around one million people died during the country's 1984–1985 famine.[1][2] The idea followed Band Aid's "Do They Know It's Christmas" project in the UK, which Belafonte had heard about.[nb 1][4] In the activist's plans, money would also be set aside to help eliminate hunger in the United States of America. Entertainment manager and fellow fundraiser Ken Kragen was contacted by Belafonte, who asked for singers Lionel Richie and Kenny Rogers—Kragen's clients—to participate in Belafonte's musical endeavor. Kragen and the two musicians agreed to help with Belafonte's mission, and in turn, enlisted the cooperation of Stevie Wonder, to add more "name value" to their project.[1] Quincy Jones was drafted to co-produce the song, taking time out from his work on The Color Purple.[1][5] Richie also telephoned Michael Jackson, who had just released the commercially successful Thriller album and had concluded a tour with his brothers.[1]
Jackson revealed to Richie that he not only wanted to sing the song, but to participate in its writing as well.[1][6] To begin with, "We Are the World" was to be written by Jackson, Richie and Wonder. As Wonder had limited time to work on the project, Jackson and Richie proceeded to write "We Are the World" themselves.[6] They began work on the song's creation at Hayvenhurst, the Encino home of Jackson and his family. For a week, the two spent every night working on lyrics and melodies in the singer's bedroom. They knew that they wanted a song which would be easy to sing and memorable. The pair wanted to create an anthem. Jackson's older sister, La Toya, watched the two work on the song, and later contended that Richie only wrote a few lines for the track.[5] She stated that her younger brother wrote 99 percent of the lyrics, "but he's never felt it necessary to say that".[5] La Toya further commented on the song's creation in an interview with the American celebrity news magazine People. "I'd go into the room while they were writing and it would be very quiet, which is odd, since Michael's usually very cheery when he works. It was very emotional for them."[6]
Richie had recorded two melodies for "We Are the World", which Jackson took, adding music and words to the song in the same day. Jackson stated, "I love working quickly. I went ahead without even Lionel knowing, I couldn't wait. I went in and came out the same night with the song completed—drums, piano, strings, and words to the chorus."[7] Jackson then presented his demo to Richie and Jones, who were both shocked; they did not expect the pop star to see the structure of the song so quickly. The next meetings between Jackson and Richie were unfruitful; the pair did not produce any additional vocals and got no work done. It was not until the night of January 21, 1985, that Richie and Jackson completed the lyrics and melody of "We Are the World" within two and a half hours, one night before the song's first recording session.[7]

Recording sessions
The first night of recording, January 22, 1985, had tight security on hand, as Richie, Jackson, Wonder and Jones started work on "We Are the World" at Kenny Rogers' Lion Share Recording Studio. The studio, on Beverly Boulevard in California, was filled with musicians, technicians, video crews, retinues, assistants and organizers as the four musicians entered. To begin the night, a "vocal guide" of "We Are the World" was recorded by Richie and Jackson and duplicated on tape for each of the invited performers. Only 2 artists are said to have not accepted the invitation - they are Donna Summer and Prince. The guide was recorded on the sixth take, as Quincy Jones felt that there was too much "thought" in the previous versions.[8]


Quincy Jones was a key figure in the production and recording of "We Are the World".
Following their work on the vocal guide, Jackson and Jones began thinking of alternatives for the line "There's a chance we're taking, we're taking our own lives": the pair were concerned that the latter part of the line would be considered a reference to suicide. As the group listened to a playback of the chorus, Richie declared that the last part of the line should be changed to "We're 'saving' our own lives", which his fellow musicians agreed with. Producer Jones also suggested altering the former part of the line. "One thing we don't want to do, especially with this group, is look like we're patting ourselves on the back. So it's really, 'There's a choice we're making.'"[9] At around 1:30 am, the four musicians ended the night by finishing a chorus of melodic vocalizations, including the sound "sha-lum sha-lin-gay".[9] Jones told the group that they were not to add anything else to the tape. "If we get too good, someone's gonna start playing it on the radio", he announced.[9]
On January 24, 1985, after a day of rest, Jones shipped Richie and Jackson's vocal guide to all of the artists who would be involved in "We Are the World"'s recording. Enclosed in the package was a letter from Jones, addressed to "My Fellow Artists":[9]
The cassettes are numbered, and I can't express how important it is not to let this material out of your hands. Please do not make copies, and return this cassette the night of the 28th. In the years to come, when your children ask, 'What did mommy and daddy do for the war against world famine?', you can say proudly, this was your contribution.[9]
Ken Kragen chaired a production meeting at a bungalow off Sunset Boulevard on January 25, 1985. There, Kragen and his team addressed where the song would be completed by the supergroup of musicians. He stated, "The single most damaging piece of information is where we're doing this. If that shows up anywhere, we've got a chaotic situation that could totally destroy the project. The moment a Prince, a Michael Jackson, a Bob Dylan—I guarantee you!—drives up and sees a mob around that studio, he will never come in."[9] On the same night, Quincy Jones' associate producer and vocal arranger, Tom Bahler, was given the task of matching each solo line with the right voice. Bahler stated, "It's like vocal arranging in a perfect world".[9] Jones disagreed, stating that the task was like "putting a watermelon in a Coke bottle".[9] The following evening, Lionel Richie held a "choreography" session at his home, where it was decided who would stand where.[9]
The final night of recording was held on January 28, 1985, at A&M Recording Studios in Hollywood, California.[3][9] Michael Jackson arrived at 9 pm, earlier than the other artists, to record his solo section and record a vocal chorus by himself.[9] He was subsequently joined in the recording studio by the remaining USA for Africa artists, which included Ray Charles, Billy Joel, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Bruce Springsteen and Smokey Robinson. Also in attendance were five of Jackson's siblings: Jackie, La Toya, Marlon, Randy and Tito.[10] Many of the participants came straight from an American Music Award ceremony, which had been held that same night.[5] Invited musician Prince, who would have had a part in which he and Michael Jackson sang to each other, did not attend the recording session.[11] The reason given for his absence has varied. One newspaper claimed that the singer did not want to record with other acts.[12] Another report, from the time of "We Are the World"'s recording, suggested that the musician did not want to partake in the session because organizer Bob Geldof called him a "creep".[13] Prince did, however, donate an exclusive track, "4 The Tears In Your Eyes", for the We Are the World album.[12] In all, more than 45 of America's top musicians participated in the recording, and another 50 had to be turned away.[11][14] Upon entering the recording studio, the musicians were greeted by a sign pinned to the door which read, "Please check your egos at the door".[15] They were also greeted by Stevie Wonder, who proclaimed that if the recording was not completed in one take, he and Ray Charles, two blind men, would drive everybody home.
Coppied by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Are_the_World

Friday, 20 August 2010

Watches the Thais rule to extradite Russian arms suspect to US


We are saw the Thais rule to extradite Russian arms suspect to US
BANGKOK (AP) -- A Thai appeals court on Friday ordered the extradition of suspected Russian arms smuggler Viktor Bout to the United States, angering Moscow but paving the way to put the man dubbed the "Merchant of Death" on trial.

Shackled in leg irons, Bout vowed to prove his innocence in an American courtroom.

"We will face the trial in the United States and win it," Bout told reporters in Russian after the verdict, according to Russia's RIA Novosti news agency.

The court ordered Bout's extradition within three months, overturning a lower court's ruling in August 2009 that rejected a U.S. request that he face trial there. No further judicial appeals are possible in Thailand.

The ruling is a victory for the Obama administration, which summoned the Thai ambassador in Washington this week so U.S. officials could "emphasize that this is of the highest priority to the United States," according to State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called the court decision "unlawful and political." Without mentioning the United States, he said the ruling was influenced by "very strong outside pressure."

Experts say Bout has been useful for Russia's intelligence apparatus, and Moscow does not want him going on trial in the United States.

Bout, a 43-year-old former Soviet air force officer, is reputed to be one of the world's most prolific arms dealers. He has allegedly supplied weapons that fueled civil wars in South America, the Middle East and Africa, with clients including Liberia's Charles Taylor and Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi and both sides of the civil war in Angola.

The head of a lucrative air transport empire, Bout has long evaded U.N. and U.S. sanctions aimed at blocking his financial activities and restricting his travel. He has denied any involvement in illicit activities and claims he ran a legitimate business.

The 2005 Nicolas Cage film, "Lord of War," is widely believed to be modeled after Bout's life.

Bout's nickname arose from his 1990s-era notoriety for running a fleet of aging Soviet-era cargo planes to conflict-ridden hotspots in Africa. A high-ranking minister at Britain's Foreign Office first used it in 2000 to single out Bout for his alleged arms role in Africa.

Dressed in an orange prison uniform, Bout stood after the verdict was announced. Tears welled in his eyes as he hugged his wife and daughter, who wept. He was led out of the courtroom and back to a Bangkok prison where court officials said he would remain until the extradition is processed.

"This is the most unfair decision possible," his wife, Alla Bout, told reporters, speaking in Russian through a translator. "It is known the world over that this is a political case."

Bout's arrest by Thai authorities in March 2008 landed Bout in prison for the first time and set off a legal tug-of-war between the U.S. and Russia.

Pavel Felgenhauer, an independent Moscow-based military analyst, called Bout a "prize catch" for Washington and an embarrassment for Moscow.

"The activities he was performing involved a lot of Russian government officials. The information he has, many parties want to keep under wraps," Felgenhauer said.

The U.S. could secure key military intelligence not only on Russia but on other former Soviet states where Bout operated, he said, adding that if Bout were to accept a plea bargain, "He could really start to sing."

Bout's arrest at a Bangkok luxury hotel was part of an elaborate sting in which U.S. agents posed as arms buyers for the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, which Washington classifies as a terrorist organization.

Bout was subsequently indicted in the U.S. on four terrorism-related charges that include conspiring to sell millions of dollars worth of weapons to FARC, including more than 700 surface-to-air missiles, thousands of guns, high-tech helicopters and airplanes outfitted with grenade launchers and missiles.

The U.S. indictment also charged Bout with conspiring to kill Americans, conspiring to kill U.S. officers or employees, and conspiring to provide material support to terrorists.

The Russian faces a maximum penalty of life in prison if convicted.

In August 2009, the Bangkok Criminal Court rejected a U.S. extradition request. It said that Thailand considers FARC a political movement and not a terrorist group, and that extradition under a Thai-U.S. treaty could not be granted for a political offense.

But the appeals court disagreed, saying Friday that under Thai law the charges against Bout were considered criminal, not political.

"Given that the defendant was charged with conspiring to kill American citizens and American officers, conspiring to source ... anti-aircraft missiles, and acquire weapons for a terrorist group like FARC - these are criminal offenses not just in the country where he is a plaintiff but also the country receiving the charges," the ruling said.

"The court has decided that these charges have no political characteristic as the lower court ruled, therefore the appeals court disagrees with the verdict," the ruling said. "The court has decided to overturn (the lower court verdict). Now Viktor Bout would have be extradited to the U.S. within three months according to the extradition act."

Bout's lawyer, Lak Nittiwattanawichan, said he would try to keep fighting.

"I am going to submit a request to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Cabinet. I will also submit a request to the king and queen," he said.

Coppied by http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AS_THAILAND_US_ARMS_SUSPECT?SITE=CAWOO&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2010-08-20-02-28-52

see Welsh migrant becomes Australia’s first female PM


Watches Welsh migrant becomes Australia’s first female PM
CANBERRA, Australia - Julia Gillard was a sickly child when her family left her native Wales in search of a warmer climate. She thrived and went on to become Australia’s first female prime minister.
Gillard was 4 years old, the younger of two sisters, when the family left the Welsh coal port of Barry for the South Australian state capital of Adelaide. She had been hospitalized with pneumonia as a child.

Gillard studied law at universities in Adelaide and Melbourne, where she became a leader in the national student union movement. At 29, she became a partner in a prominent Melbourne law firm and specialized in industrial law. Gillard was a Labor Party state political staffer before entering the federal parliament in 1998.

She became deputy Labor leader under former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd after striking a deal with him in 2006 to topple then-leader Kim Beazley.

Gillard lives with a common law partner, Tim Mathieson, a hairdresser by profession. They have been together since 2006.

Gillard, 48, decided as a teenager that she never wanted children. Her stance has led to attacks from political opponents who say she is unsuitable to lead because she lacks empathy with Australian families.

Unlike her opponent Tony Abbott and predecessor Rudd, who are both observant Christians, Gillard has declared herself atheist.

She has been accused of being a communist over ties to the far-left group Socialist Forum — allegations she denies. Gillard has also been branded an abortion advocate for her founding role in the pro-choice group Emily’s List Australia.

The Rudd-Gillard leadership team led Labor into government at general elections in 2007.

Party power-brokers blamed Rudd for dragging down the government’s popularity in recent opinion polls, and Gillard seized the leadership unopposed when she challenged him on June 24 in a party ballot.
Coppied by http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle08.asp?xfile=data/international/2010/August/international_August1050.xml§ion=international

Partner says BP hiding oil spill documents


We are see the Partner says BP hiding oil spill documents

WASHINGTON: Transocean, the company that owned the rig behind the Gulf of Mexico disaster, has accused oil giant BP of hiding key data needed for a probe in a strongly worded letter seen on Thursday.

Transocean accused BP of trying to stop any other entity from probing the April 20 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig, leased by BP, which killed 11 workers and unleashed the worst oil spill in history.

BP quickly denounced the letter, which was sent to three members of President Barack Obama's cabinet and leading members of Congress, calling it a "publicity stunt" to deflect Transocean's responsibility.

Transocean said BP had stopped even acknowledging requests for documents that "only BP has and that are critical to an honest assessment of the incident and the identification of possible improvements for the entire industry."

"BP has continued to demonstrate its unwillingness, if not outright refusal, to deliver even the most basic information to Transocean," Steven L. Roberts, a counsel at the company, wrote in the letter obtained by AFP.

"This is troubling, both in light of BP's frequently stated public commitment to openness and a fair investigation and because it appears that BP is withholding evidence in an attempt to prevent any other entity other than BP from investigating," he wrote.

Transocean, which is based in Switzerland, said earlier this month it was facing 249 lawsuits of claims over the disaster. The company has asked a court to limit its liabilities to 27 million dollars, saying it was not responsible.

Transocean is seeking 16 pieces of information from BP, including laboratory tests, logs that show transfers to the Deepwater Horizon and a chart identifying BP personnel involved on the oil rig.

British-based BP, which has promised a 20 billion-dollar compensation fund over the disaster, voiced dismay at Transocean's letter and questioned its motives.

A BP counsel, James Neath, late Thursday sent a response to Transocean saying that the company's letter included "many false and misleading assertions."

"Given its content and tone, your letter is nothing more than a publicity stunt evidently designed to draw attention away from Transocean's potential role in the Deepwater Horizon tragedy," Neath said.

He said that BP provided Transocean with "thousands of pages of documents" including lab test reports and the initial exploration plan for the Deepwater Horizon.

"From the beginning, our goal has been to help the public, the government and the industry understand what happened, why it happened and how such an accident can be prevented from ever happening again," Neath said.

Neath said BP committed to releasing its investigation to the public and "we continue to stand by that promise."

Read more: Partner says BP hiding oil spill documents - US - World - The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Partner-says-BP-hiding-oil-spill-documents/articleshow/6362020.cms#ixzz0x8qlFsD4
Coppied by http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Partner-says-BP-hiding-oil-spill-documents/articleshow/6362020.cms

Some Backstory on NBC News' Iraq Reporting


Watches Some Backstory on NBC News' Iraq Reporting
live reporting from the military convoy out of Iraq last evening left many non-NBCers wondering: How'd they get that "exclusive?" According to reports, the major broadcast was in the works for weeks and involved a request Engel submitted to the military. The word spread internally at NBC News and by Sunday MSNBC host Rachel Maddow was heading for Baghdad.

NBC News VP David Verdi told the NYTimes' Brian Stelter, "The military had said, 'You are the ones who are going to broadcast it first.'" Stelter reports:

NBC officials said their requests to report live during the withdrawal were first filed many weeks ago. The requests provoked debate within the military, with some people arguing that having reporters present would place excess attention on the fact that the troops were leaving.
A Pentagon spokesperson tells Yahoo! News' Michael Calderone that NBC did not receive exclusive coverage and that it was considered "a normal press request."

Col. Barry Johnson, a military spokesman in Iraq, also told The Upshot that the network wasn't handed the story. "NBC did not receive exclusive coverage," Johnson said. "Other media participated as well. However, at NBC's request and with the backing of the Pentagon, they were allowed to place a satellite truck in the convoy and report on the movement once it crossed the border."
Calderone reports that Fox News -- along with the AP and WaPo -- were among those other media outlets participating.

But it was NBC that had live video from a moving military convoy and, seemingly, the jump start.


Mediaite's Steve Krakauer writes, "But this fantastic coverage also showed a cooperation at least on some level between NBC and MSNBC and elements in the Obama administration... some elements within the military, so by extension the Obama administration, clearly worked with NBC (and MSNBC) to let them have this exclusive."

NBC's technological capability to have the live satellite feed with Engel aboard the convoy out of the country was obviously a factor in whatever permissions the military granted NBC. In the middle of the Iraqi desert, that's no small feat and, as made clear by the military's comments, the Bloommobile, which was in use in the Gulf as recently as a month ago, was a big part of the network's request. "We're not the only ones embedded with this last brigade that had just left Iraq," Chuck Todd said on MSNBC. "In fact I think there are four or five other news organizations. We happen to be the only one that has the technology to bring these pictures to the world tonight live, of this brigade leaving. You do get the sense, Keith, that that is what wasn't fully comprehended [by the White House]."

NBC also had the capability to deliver the largest evening news audience as well as several subsequent hours of cable coverage. Last week, "Nightly News" averaged 7.5 million viewers, the most of any network news program and more than double what the top-rated cable news program, "The O'Reilly Factor" averaged. And while its competitors at ABC and CBS also draw considerable audiences, there's not much live on-air coverage that can be offered following the 30-minute broadcast until the next morning, save the 30 minutes of "Nightline."

When Brian Williams signed off last night, Engel and Maddow, who was in Baghdad, were both live on MSNBC within eight minutes. As we reported, the network was subsequently in rolling coverage all night.
Coppied by http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/nbc/some_backstory_on_nbc_news_iraq_reporting_171215.asp